Say what you will about wikipedia – it’s got the content and the mindshare, even if it all fucked up on close inspection.
Can Knol compete with this, especially when it seems to be forgoing that delicious Google branding?
Latest
- Shame
- Pity the typewriter salesman
- hedonism is no defence
- running man (updated)
- Abra Abra Cadabra
- Covering Letter dot doc
- baby steps
- Tales from a strange world
- Comics: 1, Pirates: 0 (finally!)
- Let’s not kid ourselves (sorry, I’m talking about Flash)
- four pilots walk into a bar
- Google Calendar isn’t very smart
Links
»
Oh Boris, ever the marvellous-quote machine.
It’s actually glowing praise if you go into the full text of the interview, but I doubt most pundits will see past the unfortunate simile.
»
And like copy and paste before it, how many people will actually use this much-bemoaned “missing” feature when it actually turns up?
»
Another fine reason to open Flash up so vendors and browser makers can roll their own implementation.
»
High budget porn-spoofs continue to confound me. Who actually buys these?
Unrelated: why is The Joker holding a Star Trek TOS phaser?
0 Responses to “Google unfurls less laughable Wikipedia”